chapter 2

不要问我为什么

Overview and Core Themes
  Chapter 2 of The Digital Humanities explores how digital tools and methods are transforming the organization, representation, and interpretation of humanities research. The authors emphasize that while humanists traditionally study unique, non-reducible cultural objects—texts, artifacts, performances—digital technologies are reshaping how evidence is gathered, classified, and analyzed. This shift challenges longstanding practices while opening new possibilities for interdisciplinary and collaborative scholarship.

Key Concepts and Arguments
  Representation and Reality: Digital environments complicate the relationship between evidence and interpretation. Where humanists once relied on curated samples (e.g., archival documents), digitization allows access to vast aggregates of material. This abundance risks overwhelming researchers but also enables more comprehensive and nuanced analyses.
  Data Gathering and Digitization: Libraries, archives, and repositories have evolved from physical card catalogs to dynamic digital platforms like WorldCat and HathiTrust. These resources democratize access but also raise questions about curation, authority, and the loss of material context.
  Tools and Analysis: Digital tools—databases, spreadsheets, imaging technologies—enable efficient manipulation and interpretation of data. Projects like the Lazarus Project use multispectral imaging to recover damaged texts, illustrating how technology can uncover new layers of meaning.
  Interpretation and Aggregation: Digital platforms facilitate large-scale collaborations and interdisciplinary approaches. The Valley of the Shadow project, for example, uses digitized Civil War-era documents to support multi-perspective historical analysis, challenging singular narratives.

Critical Reflections
  This chapter highlights a tension between traditional humanistic methods—deep, contextual, often solitary engagement with sources—and the collaborative, data-driven approaches enabled by digital tools. While digitization expands access, it also risks flattening complexity; a database entry cannot fully capture the materiality of a medieval manuscript or the emotional resonance of a performance. Yet, as the authors note, digital tools can also restore what was once inaccessible, as with the Codex Vercellensi.
  The organization of research is thus not merely a logistical concern but a philosophical one: How do we balance depth with breadth, individuality with aggregation, and tradition with innovation? Digital humanities, as framed here, invites a rethinking of these binaries.

Conclusion
  Chapter 2 argues that the digital turn does not replace humanistic inquiry but enriches it, offering new ways to organize, interrogate, and represent cultural evidence. The challenge is to harness these tools without losing the critical, reflective core of humanities scholarship.