《中式英语之鉴》第5、6章读书笔记

不要问我为什么

In Chapters 5 and 6 , the author delves into the issues of redundancy and the use of vague and abstract language in English writing. The chapters are filled with practical examples that demonstrate how these linguistic habits can obscure meaning and detract from the overall clarity of the text. The author's suggestions for improvement are largely based on the principle of simplification and the need to convey ideas directly and concisely.
However, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that the application of these principles is not always straightforward. In the context of academic or legal writing, for instance, a certain level of redundancy may be necessary to ensure that all relevant points are explicitly stated and that there is no room for misinterpretation. This is particularly true in fields where terminology is highly specialized and the margin for error is minimal. Moreover, the use of precise, technical language in these contexts is not just a matter of preference but a requirement for maintaining the integrity of the discourse.
Similarly, the critique of vague and abstract language raises important questions about the nature of communication and the role of language in expressing complex ideas. While it is true that concrete and specific language can enhance clarity, it is also important to recognize that some concepts are by their very nature abstract and difficult to pin down. In philosophy, for example, much of the writing is concerned with exploring the nuances of abstract ideas, and the use of vague or abstract language may be essential for capturing the richness and complexity of these concepts.
The author's emphasis on simplicity and conciseness also prompts a broader discussion about the balance between form and content in writing. In some genres, such as creative writing or literary fiction, the choice of language is not just a matter of conveying information but also of creating a particular atmosphere or evoking certain emotions. In these cases, the use of more poetic or abstract language may be deliberate and integral to the overall aesthetic of the work.
Reflecting on these chapters, it is clear that the guidelines offered by the author should be seen as a starting point rather than a set of rigid rules. The process of translation and writing involves a delicate balance between the need for clarity and precision and the demands of style, genre, and context. Translators and writers must be able to navigate these complexities with a deep understanding of both the source and target languages, as well as the cultural and disciplinary norms that shape their use.
Moreover, the insights from these chapters highlight the importance of critical thinking and cultural sensitivity in the translation process. What may be considered clear and concise in one linguistic or cultural context may not necessarily be so in another. Translators must therefore be attuned to the subtle differences in language use and be willing to adapt their strategies to ensure that the intended meaning is conveyed effectively and appropriately.
In conclusion, Chapters 5 and 6 of the book provide valuable insights into common pitfalls in English writing. However, the application of the author's advice requires a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between language, context, and genre. By approaching these issues with an open mind and a commitment to continuous learning, translators and writers can develop the skills and flexibility needed to produce clear, effective, and culturally sensitive writing in any context. The true challenge lies not in eliminating redundancy or avoiding abstract language but in finding the right balance that best serves the needs of the text and its intended audience.