Reading Notes: Chapter 1 "Introduction to the Digital Humanities"

不要问我为什么

Overview and Definitions

Chapter 1 of The Digital Humanities: A Primer for Students and Scholars by Eileen Gardiner and Ronald G. Musto serves as a foundational introduction to the digital humanities (DH). The authors emphasize the complexity of defining DH, presenting it as a multidisciplinary field intersecting computing and humanities disciplines such as history, philosophy, linguistics, literature, and art. They contrast two perspectives: one viewing DH as a methodological enhancement to traditional humanities work, and another seeing it as a transformative force redefining knowledge creation in the information age.

Historical Context

The chapter traces the origins of DH to 1949, when Italian Jesuit Roberto Busa collaborated with IBM’s Thomas J. Watson to index Thomas Aquinas’s works. This historical example underscores the long-standing relationship between humanities scholarship and computational tools. The authors argue that DH is not merely about efficiency but aims for qualitative improvements in research, interpretation, and dissemination of knowledge.

Key Themes and Questions

Gardiner and Musto explore critical questions about DH’s impact: Does it fundamentally alter humanities scholarship, or does it simply enhance traditional methods? They caution against overly futuristic or deterministic views, noting that everyday tools like word processors and PDFs have been more transformative than high-end applications like virtual reality. The chapter also addresses concerns about funding, accessibility, and the potential marginalization of traditional humanities in academia.

Philosophical and Practical Tensions

The authors highlight the tension between DH as a specialized field and as an integral part of humanities work. They stress the importance of grounding DH in the historical traditions of humanism, which emerged from the studia humanitatis of the Renaissance—focusing on grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry, and moral philosophy. This historical perspective invites readers to consider whether DH represents a continuation of humanist ideals or a departure from them.

Conclusion

Chapter 1 sets the stage for the book by framing DH as a dynamic, evolving field that challenges and expands the boundaries of humanities scholarship. It encourages readers to critically engage with both the promises and pitfalls of digital methodologies while emphasizing the enduring relevance of humanistic inquiry.