|
|
Introduction
Chapter 7, "Systems Theories," marks a pivotal shift in translation studies by moving beyond static linguistic models to explore translation as part of broader sociocultural systems. Emerging in the 1970s, this approach, influenced by scholars like Itamar Even-Zohar and Gideon Toury, emphasizes the role of translation within dynamic cultural and literary frameworks. It challenges prescriptive views by focusing on descriptive analysis, norms, and the systemic positioning of translated texts, thereby enriching translation theory with interdisciplinary insights.
Even-Zohar’s Polysystem Theory
Even-Zohar’s polysystem theory redefines translated literature as an integral component of the target culture’s literary system, rather than a derivative form. Drawing on Russian Formalism, he conceptualizes literature as a hierarchical, evolving network where translation can occupy either a primary or secondary position. Primary positioning occurs when translations introduce innovation (e.g., in "young" or peripheral literatures), while secondary positioning leads to conformity to target-culture norms. This theory highlights how translation strategies are shaped by cultural power dynamics, with primary translations tending toward "adequacy" (close to the source text) and secondary ones toward "acceptability" (adapted to target norms). Even-Zohar’s work underscores the sociohistorical contingencies governing translation, though it has been critiqued for overgeneralization and reliance on outdated models.
Toury’s Descriptive Translation Studies (DTS)
Gideon Toury advances polysystem theory through a systematic methodology for DTS, aiming to identify probabilistic "laws" of translation. His three-phase model involves: (1) situating the translation within the target culture; (2) comparing source and target texts to map "shifts"; and (3) deriving generalizations about translational norms. Toury introduces key concepts like "initial norms" (balancing adequacy and acceptability) and "operational norms" (covering matricial and textual-linguistic choices). He proposes laws such as "growing standardization" (TT conforms to target patterns) and "interference" (ST features influence TT). While praised for moving away from equivalence-based models, Toury’s approach faces criticism for its subjectivity in text comparison and limited attention to sociopolitical factors.
Chesterman’s Norms and Beyond
Andrew Chesterman expands on norms by categorizing them into "product norms" (expectations of the target audience) and "process norms" (professional standards of accountability, communication, and relation). His framework emphasizes the prescriptive pressure norms exert on translators, bridging descriptive and ethical considerations. Other scholars, like Lambert and van Gorp, contribute to systems theory with detailed schemas for analyzing textual networks, reinforcing the interdisciplinary nature of this approach.
Case Study and Implications
The case study of Harry Potter translations into Italian and Spanish illustrates how norms operate in practice: the Spanish version retains source-language elements (reflecting acceptability), while the Italian version adapts names creatively (reflecting adequacy). This underscores the role of cultural context in shaping strategies. Systems theories collectively highlight translation as a norm-governed activity, though they risk overlooking ideological influences and individual translator agency.
Conclusion
Chapter 7 demonstrates how systems theories enrich translation studies by contextualizing translation within cultural and historical systems. By focusing on norms, laws, and descriptive analysis, theorists like Even-Zohar and Toury provide tools to explore translational behaviors beyond linguistic equivalence. However, the approach’s limitations—such as its potential neglect of power imbalances—invite further integration with cultural and postcolonial theories. Ultimately, systems theories underscore translation’s complexity as both a product and a process embedded in societal structures. |
|